![]() It also adds patient animation in time with compressions. The patient's name displayed is either their first name only or the name set on the HUD. ![]() It makes an excellent piece for an EMS or paramedic team, hospital emergency room, or other medical center. The Thumper is also copyable, so you can outfit your entire facility for one price. The box includes two version: a Thumper worn on the spine (for when the victim needs to be laying on another piece of furniture or in a moving ambulance) and a rezzable version with laying animation. CPR is considered high quality when it provides a chest compression fraction of greater than 80, a compression rate of 100120 per minute, and a compression depth of at least 2 inches in adults (or 1/3 of the anteroposterior dimensions of the thorax for infants or children). The device also gives a wearable CPR mask (no mechanical effect, but it adds realism). The ratio of compressions to ventilation can be set to either 30:2 or 15:2. It also animates the victim's chest in time with the compressions. The Thumper is fully scripted, with an animated piston and controls to set the arm's position, depth of compressions, and optional ventilation (compatible with the Mercy patient HUD v5). Its piston provides steady, consistent chest compressions. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.When a victim needs reliable CPR but manpower is limited, or during a prolonged cardiac arrest, the Thumper is here to help. Low compliance with the 2 minutes of uninterrupted chest compressions recommended in the 2010 International Resuscitation Guidelines. Sánchez B, Algarte R, Piacentini E, Trenado J, Romay E, Cerdà M et al. Variability in quality of chest compressions provided during simulated cardiac arrest across nine pediatric institutions. International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education CPR Investigators. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.010Ĭheng A, Hunt EA, Grant D, Lin Y, Grant V, Duff JP et al. ROC Investigators: A quantitative analysis of out-of-hospital pediatric and adolescent resuscitation quality-A report from the ROC epistry-cardiac arrest. Sutton RM, Case E, Brown SP, Atkins DL, Nadkarni VM, Kaltman J, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Maconochie IK, Bingham R, Eich C, López-Herce J, Rodríguez-Nuñez A, Rajka T, et al. Part 6: Pediatric basic life support and pediatric advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Maconochie IK, de Caen AR, Aickin R, Atkins DL, Biarent D, Guerguerian AM, et al. In a pediatric animal model of cardiac arrest, mechanical piston chest compressions produced lower survival rates than manual chest compressions, without any differences in hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. In the mechanical CC group there was a non significant higher incidence of haemorrhage through the endotracheal tube (45% vs 20%, p = 0.114). Survival rate was higher in the manual CC (15 of 30 = 50%) than in the mechanical CC group (3 of 20 = 15%) p = 0.016. There were no significant differences in MAP, DAP, arterial blood gases and etCO2 between chest compression techniques during CPR. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial blood gases and end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) values were measured at 3, 9, 18 and 24 minutes after the beginning of resuscitation. Animals were randomized to receive either manual CC or mechanical CC using a pediatric piston chest compressions device (Life-Stat®, Michigan Instruments). The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of manual and mechanical chest compressions with Thumper device in a pediatric cardiac arrest animal model.Īn experimental model of asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA) in 50 piglets (mean weight 9.6 kg) was used. Mechanical CC could be more effective than manual CC, but there are no studies comparing both techniques in children. Chest compressions (CC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are not sufficiently effective in many circumstances.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |